|
One problem I see within the Architecture profession that is the result
of early training in architects' careers is their attempt to distinguish
themselves from the rest of the design community. With the growing diversity
and cultural significance of design, we can no longer afford to produce
well-intentioned, misinformed, bad architects. Design is about discovery,
and many architects have never taken the chance to explore outside of
their own buildings. By exposing young architects to a wealth of design
professionals early in their careers, they might realize their place as
architects within the design community, not outside it. I propose that
by giving IDP credit to young architects who explore neighboring fields
of design during their internships, NCARB can begin to produce a more
well-informed, thoughtful architect. If viewed from all sides of the spectrum,
good design becomes a more rewarding prospect.
We live in a world where architects are considered design experts. These
so-called 'design experts" may be competent at designing grand spaces,
but would be at a loss as to how to outfit the interiors effectively.
This disjoint is problematic for architects, for they are neither artist
nor engineer, but most of today's critics would define a successful building
as the combination of these two. It is important for architects to understand
that the definition of a successful building is changing within the broader
context of society. If we are to reflect an evolving culture, then we
as architects must evolve as well. Consider the Modernist Movement as
a starting point. Remember a time where artists, architects and designers
collaborated to pave a path for society to enter the Modern World. If
architects can begin to consider themselves part of the current cultural
movement within design, we may again be able to guide society. Today's
underpaid, overworked architect is less likely to collaborate with an
artist to imbue their building with lofty ideals of cultural salvation
than they are to collaborate with a code consultant to attempt to achieve
maximum FAR, or with investors on how to efficiently make the most money.
Sadly, the days of true Modernism have come to a close, the days when
"A Machine for Living" meant something more than a respirator.
By exposing young architects to all aspects of the design world, we might
ingrain a renewed spark of hope within the profession. That this spark
could begin a new phase in architecture where architects and designers
work as one to bring society up to the next level is not impossible. To
truly understand what should be changed about the architectural profession
and to truly see where it is headed, we must view ourselves through the
eyes of our colleagues on the other side of the fence. And ultimately,
we must see that the first step to our future is to tear down that fence.
|